ps3Billet rapide pour dire que le bug semble résolu. Je n’ai cependant pas vérifié personnellement sur ma PS3.
Quick Note to say that the bug seems resolved. However, I did not check personally on my PS3.

Voici le commentaire de sony :
Sony comments :

We are aware that the internal clock functionality in the PS3 units other than the slim model, recognized the year 2010 as a leap year. Having the internal clock date change from February 29 to March 1 (both GMT), we have verified that the symptoms are now resolved and that users are able to use their PS3 normally.

If the time displayed on the XMB is still incorrect, users are able to adjust time settings manually or via the internet. If we have new information, we will update you through the PlayStation.Blog or

We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

En gros la console a compté cette année comme une année bissextile ^^. Reste à espérer que ce genre de petite blague ne se reproduise pas. Car si pour nous en tant qu’utilisateurs cela occasionne une gène, c’est bel et bien Sony qui en pâtit le plus. De tels incidents ne sont jamais bons pour une société de l’envergure de Sony.

Basically PS3 was counted this year as a leap year ^ ^. Hopefully, this kind of little joke does not recur. If for us as users it causes discomfort, it is actually Sony who suffers the most. Such incidents are never good for a major company like Sony.

Étiquettes : , , ,
4 réponses à “PS3 : le bug de mars 2010 [MAJ]”
  1. moemoekyun dit :

    hahah yeah I heard about that Bug and suddenly disappear @_@


    mikiwank Reply:

    It’s 2000 year’s bug but… 10 years later 😆


  2. softz dit :

    Today’s newpaper just mentioned about the PS3 bug again. Tsk Tsk.
    .-= softz´s last blog ..How-To: Dynamically Invoke C++ DLL Function in C#? =-.


    mikiwank Reply:

    This is why I’m hesitaded to restart my ps3 yesterday :(



XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> Paperblog